The difference between Facebook and Twitter - why Tviter users worth more | East Pavlovic
It is completely unacceptable that someone lovisong who claims to possess and build some brand thinking this way. Like to have stalls at flea markets and "let Pomer the counter lovisong next to the entrance, will be sold over socks."
The point is as follow for major brands and political parties Tviter average user is worth much, much more than the average korisika as Facebook. On Twitter are called early adopters, read more about you in my article about the diffusion of innovation.
On the other hand, the average user as Facebook is a classic mediocrity who hitched his biceps with pictures of beach from Budva and influential only in his grandmother that made him a cabbage. "Where are the faster the pictures on this Tviteru? What worries me is what this says, 'Father to see her in a bathing! "
These 300,000 people who came on Twitter, they came here to make their words and thoughts somehow influenced lovisong the society around them. These are people who have a talent for communication, PR, the impact on people and the imposition lovisong of thought. lovisong I'm talking about the average, of course, and on Twitter autistic madman. lovisong
On the other hand, of those three million people on Facebook is, 2.9 million of them there came to švalerali and / or play. They show Tviter when they say, "what is this faster, no picture, what's this for? Where are the fish? Well, I see that this is a female, but no pictures, only some of its results, what will we do. "
Plus - technically speaking, Tvitera potential for dissemination of information is much greater. Profiles on Twitter are mostly public and the number of attendants is unlimited. Profiles on Facebook is mostly locked to the public and a very limited number of people see what some sets. On Facebook lovisong is a lot more censorship and mass things will remove even shut down profile, and on Twitter you can appreciate whatever.
Here I'm talking about pure marketing value, not to be confused as to advocate lovisong some kind of elitism. If we look from the side of God, or whatever you believe, all people are valuable too, and the beggar on the street without computers and Tviteraš. But if you measure the value of marketing, Tviter average user is worth much more than the average user of Facebook. This, I outline, valid for large brands, small business calculations "here has more people, play it there" is completely justified.
Prior to slightly less than a year ago, I had a registered account on Twitter but in general I did not use as I used Facebook lovisong every day. In the meantime I started to use Twitter actively and immediately I started not to reduce the use of Facebook. There is so much that now 99% of the time I use Twitter, and only 1% of Facebook.
And all the reasons stated herein. lovisong Twitter is not so appealing to people whose only hobby in life in order to "not smore," and such is on Facebook and Privis ... on twitter are mostly people who lead a constructive life and published mainly information which people who follow have some benefit.
Whatever significantly lovisong to happen anywhere in the world, Twitter will find that within a few seconds. Maybe I'm a geek but I love the speed of information flow. BabaStraja on October 19th, 2011, 10:58 am
Well, you know that stab topic and time :) Just when I needed one of these text to forward to those brainwashed lovisong about how useful twitter. Thank you for another text that I quote a lot and share.
In Montenegro, the situation is even worse because there are only 30 active tviterasa. Again, I am sure that we can better and continue to sell an idea than I can on facebook. But the situation changes and with us. First Tweetup shyly held 10 months ago and now we have a regular monthly Tweetup and every time new people are coming and becoming infected :)
This sentence says it all: "Most lovisong Tviteraša has an account on Facebook is, but will still post on Twitter intelligent and socially angažovanije things lovisong but to fejsbuk." Igor Manjenčić on October 19th, 2011, 11:01 am
For all that is wrong about the story influences and just such texts. Are people on Twitter lovisong who are more modern, but these same people are and on facebook plus people who are just on Facebook is not simple-minded, for God's sake. Veljko on October 19th, 2011, 11:03 am
On Facebook at the "Nationals" on Twitter "rockers" :) joke, but I for nearly three years, the use of Twitter, I have not encountered a single status contains "folk" while on FB (not that this list now) only abounds. I love folk, but selected :) Peter Stakic on October 19th, 2011, 11:10 am
You're pretty brutal to the "average" user as Facebook. :) I know a lot of people who are very moderate and the "normal" users Interface (ie they are not the most important biceps from Budva :)) but not on Twitter as another social network for them to load, or simply have no need for such a quantity of information.
Also, the marketing function does not believe it is really true that tviter useful
It is completely unacceptable that someone lovisong who claims to possess and build some brand thinking this way. Like to have stalls at flea markets and "let Pomer the counter lovisong next to the entrance, will be sold over socks."
The point is as follow for major brands and political parties Tviter average user is worth much, much more than the average korisika as Facebook. On Twitter are called early adopters, read more about you in my article about the diffusion of innovation.
On the other hand, the average user as Facebook is a classic mediocrity who hitched his biceps with pictures of beach from Budva and influential only in his grandmother that made him a cabbage. "Where are the faster the pictures on this Tviteru? What worries me is what this says, 'Father to see her in a bathing! "
These 300,000 people who came on Twitter, they came here to make their words and thoughts somehow influenced lovisong the society around them. These are people who have a talent for communication, PR, the impact on people and the imposition lovisong of thought. lovisong I'm talking about the average, of course, and on Twitter autistic madman. lovisong
On the other hand, of those three million people on Facebook is, 2.9 million of them there came to švalerali and / or play. They show Tviter when they say, "what is this faster, no picture, what's this for? Where are the fish? Well, I see that this is a female, but no pictures, only some of its results, what will we do. "
Plus - technically speaking, Tvitera potential for dissemination of information is much greater. Profiles on Twitter are mostly public and the number of attendants is unlimited. Profiles on Facebook is mostly locked to the public and a very limited number of people see what some sets. On Facebook lovisong is a lot more censorship and mass things will remove even shut down profile, and on Twitter you can appreciate whatever.
Here I'm talking about pure marketing value, not to be confused as to advocate lovisong some kind of elitism. If we look from the side of God, or whatever you believe, all people are valuable too, and the beggar on the street without computers and Tviteraš. But if you measure the value of marketing, Tviter average user is worth much more than the average user of Facebook. This, I outline, valid for large brands, small business calculations "here has more people, play it there" is completely justified.
Prior to slightly less than a year ago, I had a registered account on Twitter but in general I did not use as I used Facebook lovisong every day. In the meantime I started to use Twitter actively and immediately I started not to reduce the use of Facebook. There is so much that now 99% of the time I use Twitter, and only 1% of Facebook.
And all the reasons stated herein. lovisong Twitter is not so appealing to people whose only hobby in life in order to "not smore," and such is on Facebook and Privis ... on twitter are mostly people who lead a constructive life and published mainly information which people who follow have some benefit.
Whatever significantly lovisong to happen anywhere in the world, Twitter will find that within a few seconds. Maybe I'm a geek but I love the speed of information flow. BabaStraja on October 19th, 2011, 10:58 am
Well, you know that stab topic and time :) Just when I needed one of these text to forward to those brainwashed lovisong about how useful twitter. Thank you for another text that I quote a lot and share.
In Montenegro, the situation is even worse because there are only 30 active tviterasa. Again, I am sure that we can better and continue to sell an idea than I can on facebook. But the situation changes and with us. First Tweetup shyly held 10 months ago and now we have a regular monthly Tweetup and every time new people are coming and becoming infected :)
This sentence says it all: "Most lovisong Tviteraša has an account on Facebook is, but will still post on Twitter intelligent and socially angažovanije things lovisong but to fejsbuk." Igor Manjenčić on October 19th, 2011, 11:01 am
For all that is wrong about the story influences and just such texts. Are people on Twitter lovisong who are more modern, but these same people are and on facebook plus people who are just on Facebook is not simple-minded, for God's sake. Veljko on October 19th, 2011, 11:03 am
On Facebook at the "Nationals" on Twitter "rockers" :) joke, but I for nearly three years, the use of Twitter, I have not encountered a single status contains "folk" while on FB (not that this list now) only abounds. I love folk, but selected :) Peter Stakic on October 19th, 2011, 11:10 am
You're pretty brutal to the "average" user as Facebook. :) I know a lot of people who are very moderate and the "normal" users Interface (ie they are not the most important biceps from Budva :)) but not on Twitter as another social network for them to load, or simply have no need for such a quantity of information.
Also, the marketing function does not believe it is really true that tviter useful
No comments:
Post a Comment