No releases | logic
"What ceremony of words could patch up the devastation?" RSS Follow me on Twitter Home hat opposite the site and me What is this? Minifst - Song Generation-bit Qudus - of the things I Terms of Use Contact Us
Let's start from the end: You can not require an employee to negotiate with the employer. You can not require an employee who has a corporate leadership to accept the agreements of corporate leadership. You can not require an employee to continue the old factory shop working. This is true for anyone who does not work - labor (ie, Israel, a soldier on active duty). This rule can exclude employees who have signed a contract for that case, although it can require the employee to continue working until the end of the period, the employer can sue the employee compensation for breach of contract. But you can not tie his forced the old factory shop work place. Yet despite Hawidntiot of the above, there are some who believe that there is room to avoid sweeping the resignation of the interns, as did our shame Labour Court. Most often, the old factory shop the claims of those few do not hold water, even if they will dedicate a few words and nothing more, it would be more than they deserve. But there are some people - this post them - bloody hearts they write, and their claims are drafted the old factory shop in makes them a semblance compelling, though in practice they are not indicative not deep thinking and the evidence clearly of reality, and they have to answer more gravitas if only the fear that someone sees the essence rhetoric.
And now from the beginning: the public despises strikes. This point frighteningly correct, and it has a good reason: the old factory shop almost never strikes do not happen in the private sector. An example is quite unusual light rail drivers strike, workers' Connex. "Such strikes especially harmful to society [1]. In the case of light rail, for example, no travel no revenues. There are good reasons causing them strikes in the private sector are more rare event of strikes in the public sector [2], but are outside the scope of this post. Such strikes from direct economic pressure on the owners of the company. Conversely, when the strike in the public sector - the Port Authority, the IEC, teachers, nurses, social workers, public the old factory shop health doctors, etc. - in most cases, the strike does not cause direct economic the old factory shop damage to the employer. While teachers are on strike damaged the economy [3], but not caused economic damage directly to the Ministry of Education. neighbor who suffered damage is mainly public the old factory shop user of these services. strike Ministry of Interior harms civilians who need to issue certificates and documents from the authorities, for example. goal here almost say, one to one, the dictionary definition of terrorism: pressuring the uninvolved by causing it to that population will affect the leadership to change course. perspective that there is no difference between the Interior Ministry employees and their strike hypothetical suicide bomber.
Who recently claimed the old factory shop he did absolutely right abdominal pain, of course. There are four fundamental differences, two of which are two sides of the same coin, that ignoring them is the only conclusion that prohibit strikes: one public servant definition employed by the public, so if the public is injured, the employer actually has suffered. The second is that although the ministry in charge or the entire government are financially or otherwise harmed as a result of the strike, we are paying them to fight the Ribno and harmed us, and to prevent or reduce this damage. When I can not get a passport, it's not "my problem", but also the problem of representatives to parliament. Easy to see that the second argument the old factory shop is another way of phrasing the first, that is enough. The third difference is the strike in the public the old factory shop sector never gets a surprise: a product of a declaration early labor dispute, failure the old factory shop of the negotiations, the public and media practice widely. Finally, the strike can take out an injunction, which is an impossible thing when it comes to terrorist attacks, of course. The fourth difference lies in the alternative. If you push the man to the wall, it will use any weapon to have him. If, say, a group of citizens negate the citizenship of their political opponents, preventing them from employment and access to resources, denying the freedom of association and the proper legal representation and refuses to negotiate with them, it will be foolish on their part to assume that a group just see all the channels the old factory shop of the legitimate close and decide to stop fight for freedom. Most terrorist groups worldwide - Palestinian story included - have alternatives [4] carnage, and the choice among them is just that - a choice (not particularly good). In contrast, workers in the public service the old factory shop does not have a lot of choices: the old factory shop if the Treasury refuses to negotiate with them, or alternatively flexible positions, they can quit or continue working, or put pressure on the public - that, ultimately, is their employer and it should be the owners of the Treasury manages the money. Not always given the option to resign is good for them, a strike is the only means at their disposal. the old factory shop
And all four of these differences exceeds one simple the old factory shop moral argument: the fact that the public is suffering strikes and despise them not deny the moral right to strike. The opposite is true - if the person is a public employee, subject to the limitations whole for being a public servant [5], provides an essential service to the public and receives his salary from the public right - the public employer and the public is harmed as a result of his strike. It's fine moral, and not just because you can not argue that public officials the old factory shop employed by the "state" more than you can argue that rabbis employed by God - the Treasury has no equity and financiers other than the public - but also because there is no novelty moral negation the old factory shop of this right prevents The only step remaining public servant wants to continue working but want the terms of which will be improved. definition, public market is one that has no competition: employee of the Ministry of Interior can not go to work for competitors. absence of pressure that exist in virtually every employee in the private sector, working in the public sector without the right strike rule processing, examination being completely unable to affect real impact on employment conditions.
Msbissno the right to strike, we must recognize that Sa
"What ceremony of words could patch up the devastation?" RSS Follow me on Twitter Home hat opposite the site and me What is this? Minifst - Song Generation-bit Qudus - of the things I Terms of Use Contact Us
Let's start from the end: You can not require an employee to negotiate with the employer. You can not require an employee who has a corporate leadership to accept the agreements of corporate leadership. You can not require an employee to continue the old factory shop working. This is true for anyone who does not work - labor (ie, Israel, a soldier on active duty). This rule can exclude employees who have signed a contract for that case, although it can require the employee to continue working until the end of the period, the employer can sue the employee compensation for breach of contract. But you can not tie his forced the old factory shop work place. Yet despite Hawidntiot of the above, there are some who believe that there is room to avoid sweeping the resignation of the interns, as did our shame Labour Court. Most often, the old factory shop the claims of those few do not hold water, even if they will dedicate a few words and nothing more, it would be more than they deserve. But there are some people - this post them - bloody hearts they write, and their claims are drafted the old factory shop in makes them a semblance compelling, though in practice they are not indicative not deep thinking and the evidence clearly of reality, and they have to answer more gravitas if only the fear that someone sees the essence rhetoric.
And now from the beginning: the public despises strikes. This point frighteningly correct, and it has a good reason: the old factory shop almost never strikes do not happen in the private sector. An example is quite unusual light rail drivers strike, workers' Connex. "Such strikes especially harmful to society [1]. In the case of light rail, for example, no travel no revenues. There are good reasons causing them strikes in the private sector are more rare event of strikes in the public sector [2], but are outside the scope of this post. Such strikes from direct economic pressure on the owners of the company. Conversely, when the strike in the public sector - the Port Authority, the IEC, teachers, nurses, social workers, public the old factory shop health doctors, etc. - in most cases, the strike does not cause direct economic the old factory shop damage to the employer. While teachers are on strike damaged the economy [3], but not caused economic damage directly to the Ministry of Education. neighbor who suffered damage is mainly public the old factory shop user of these services. strike Ministry of Interior harms civilians who need to issue certificates and documents from the authorities, for example. goal here almost say, one to one, the dictionary definition of terrorism: pressuring the uninvolved by causing it to that population will affect the leadership to change course. perspective that there is no difference between the Interior Ministry employees and their strike hypothetical suicide bomber.
Who recently claimed the old factory shop he did absolutely right abdominal pain, of course. There are four fundamental differences, two of which are two sides of the same coin, that ignoring them is the only conclusion that prohibit strikes: one public servant definition employed by the public, so if the public is injured, the employer actually has suffered. The second is that although the ministry in charge or the entire government are financially or otherwise harmed as a result of the strike, we are paying them to fight the Ribno and harmed us, and to prevent or reduce this damage. When I can not get a passport, it's not "my problem", but also the problem of representatives to parliament. Easy to see that the second argument the old factory shop is another way of phrasing the first, that is enough. The third difference is the strike in the public the old factory shop sector never gets a surprise: a product of a declaration early labor dispute, failure the old factory shop of the negotiations, the public and media practice widely. Finally, the strike can take out an injunction, which is an impossible thing when it comes to terrorist attacks, of course. The fourth difference lies in the alternative. If you push the man to the wall, it will use any weapon to have him. If, say, a group of citizens negate the citizenship of their political opponents, preventing them from employment and access to resources, denying the freedom of association and the proper legal representation and refuses to negotiate with them, it will be foolish on their part to assume that a group just see all the channels the old factory shop of the legitimate close and decide to stop fight for freedom. Most terrorist groups worldwide - Palestinian story included - have alternatives [4] carnage, and the choice among them is just that - a choice (not particularly good). In contrast, workers in the public service the old factory shop does not have a lot of choices: the old factory shop if the Treasury refuses to negotiate with them, or alternatively flexible positions, they can quit or continue working, or put pressure on the public - that, ultimately, is their employer and it should be the owners of the Treasury manages the money. Not always given the option to resign is good for them, a strike is the only means at their disposal. the old factory shop
And all four of these differences exceeds one simple the old factory shop moral argument: the fact that the public is suffering strikes and despise them not deny the moral right to strike. The opposite is true - if the person is a public employee, subject to the limitations whole for being a public servant [5], provides an essential service to the public and receives his salary from the public right - the public employer and the public is harmed as a result of his strike. It's fine moral, and not just because you can not argue that public officials the old factory shop employed by the "state" more than you can argue that rabbis employed by God - the Treasury has no equity and financiers other than the public - but also because there is no novelty moral negation the old factory shop of this right prevents The only step remaining public servant wants to continue working but want the terms of which will be improved. definition, public market is one that has no competition: employee of the Ministry of Interior can not go to work for competitors. absence of pressure that exist in virtually every employee in the private sector, working in the public sector without the right strike rule processing, examination being completely unable to affect real impact on employment conditions.
Msbissno the right to strike, we must recognize that Sa
No comments:
Post a Comment