Nuclear power? Yes, please! | Nuclear Secrets for a lower price
How much your house is a device that works with electricity? Saskaitījāt? Imagine that three-quarters of them will not be able to use. What atmetīsit? Neskatīsities television? Not be using the computer? Dedzināsit candles? Now imagine that such a choice can be made a whole country. Having unlocked first - residential homes, factories, offices? What to do if not enough in schools and hospitals?
That's the problem 2009th The will face Lithuania. Currently, about three-quarters of the Lithuanian electricity is generated by a power plant. This power does not flare oil or gas, so it is not dependent on Russia favored and does not contribute to global warming. The construction of the power plant was not necessary to flood large areas and destroy the heritage monuments. The station uses a very efficient source of energy, it is not an accident, and it provides work for a whole city. This power plant has only one drawback: it is a nuclear power plant, nuclear power plant and has since 1986. would no longer acceptable way of producing shafing dish electricity.
So what happened in 1986. year? Here's what. The Soviet Union had declared nuclear energy as one of the energy priorities of the program and, therefore, began to build nuclear power plants across the country. In turn, the quality and safety of the Soviet Union was not a priority, so they invented a highly simplified reactor types, arguing that it is as safe as other reactors. These reactors installed in the Chernobyl NPP.
In 1986. OF 26. April Chernobyl was made - ironically - a security test to determine whether the reactor shafing dish is able to function if it is not supplied electricity (who both produce electricity, but for him it is necessary to operate.) The test was designed in the past, but it was canceled for the night, when the team took that either there had been no major nuclear experts. It was followed by a series of unfortunate events: the reactor power to test the level was reduced too fast and it fell too low, in order to increase shafing dish several times was conducted safely, whereas the staff really did not understand what takes place in the reactor, the test continued, although the reactor dangerous activity growth and, ultimately, shafing dish when the reactor shuts off the power peculiar structure of the beginning of a sharp increase. All of these errors result shafing dish in nuclear reactor exploded and caught fire and then, izbārstot radioactive fallout over a wide area.
Soviet Union at the beginning of this event responded that, as a rule in the Soviet Union reacted to various shafing dish unpleasant things: pretending that nothing has happened. The day after the accident nearby, built in the city Pripjat people walking in summer clothes and wondered why the streets are so much dust. First May almost a nearby Kiev hosted the parade. People marched through the streets and celebrated realizing how radiation they receive. Only then, when people began to worry abroad, from whence so much to them to radiation, the Soviet Union recognized that an accident has occurred.
Of course, this event in the eyes of the Soviet Union, the ruling Dura irresponsible, careless attitude towards people shafing dish and life safety and low quality standards, which also led to the accident. However, the majority of people out there saw something else: a clear proof that nuclear power is unacceptably dangerous form of energy that should shafing dish be banned as soon as possible.
This reaction shafing dish is quite unusual. For example, when the Titanic sank, people concluded that vessels need to provide lifeboats for all people, not for a ban on passenger ships. When people died in car accidents, manufacturers decided to introduce seat belts, not ban cars. However, after the Chernobyl accident, shafing dish the people came to the conclusion not that nuclear power plants are variations in safety standards are not acceptable, but the fact that nuclear energy should be banned.
Atomic opponents quickly realized that fear works much better for logical explanations, so wrote a new fear stories shafing dish of what they called the arguments against the use of nuclear energy. These are about as follows:
1) Any AES can happen at any time of the second Chernobyl. Might as well also say that any aircraft at any time, it may fall and everyone who travels by plane, shafing dish a significant shafing dish risk their lives. However, such arguments shafing dish do not take into account the facts: flying is the safest way to travel, shafing dish and any other nuclear power plant, shafing dish either before or after the Chernobyl accident has taken place, no, that would be something about it comparable. The number of victims in terms of the next largest crash happened in Japan, died when two AES employees.
2) AES is a potential terrorist target. Terrorism seems to be today's shafing dish favorite bogey. By being able to justify everything from invasions of Iraq and ending with the closing of AES. Of course, the obvious solution is to strengthen nuclear security, but it certainly is not as easy as it shut down.
3) AES pollute the environment.
How much your house is a device that works with electricity? Saskaitījāt? Imagine that three-quarters of them will not be able to use. What atmetīsit? Neskatīsities television? Not be using the computer? Dedzināsit candles? Now imagine that such a choice can be made a whole country. Having unlocked first - residential homes, factories, offices? What to do if not enough in schools and hospitals?
That's the problem 2009th The will face Lithuania. Currently, about three-quarters of the Lithuanian electricity is generated by a power plant. This power does not flare oil or gas, so it is not dependent on Russia favored and does not contribute to global warming. The construction of the power plant was not necessary to flood large areas and destroy the heritage monuments. The station uses a very efficient source of energy, it is not an accident, and it provides work for a whole city. This power plant has only one drawback: it is a nuclear power plant, nuclear power plant and has since 1986. would no longer acceptable way of producing shafing dish electricity.
So what happened in 1986. year? Here's what. The Soviet Union had declared nuclear energy as one of the energy priorities of the program and, therefore, began to build nuclear power plants across the country. In turn, the quality and safety of the Soviet Union was not a priority, so they invented a highly simplified reactor types, arguing that it is as safe as other reactors. These reactors installed in the Chernobyl NPP.
In 1986. OF 26. April Chernobyl was made - ironically - a security test to determine whether the reactor shafing dish is able to function if it is not supplied electricity (who both produce electricity, but for him it is necessary to operate.) The test was designed in the past, but it was canceled for the night, when the team took that either there had been no major nuclear experts. It was followed by a series of unfortunate events: the reactor power to test the level was reduced too fast and it fell too low, in order to increase shafing dish several times was conducted safely, whereas the staff really did not understand what takes place in the reactor, the test continued, although the reactor dangerous activity growth and, ultimately, shafing dish when the reactor shuts off the power peculiar structure of the beginning of a sharp increase. All of these errors result shafing dish in nuclear reactor exploded and caught fire and then, izbārstot radioactive fallout over a wide area.
Soviet Union at the beginning of this event responded that, as a rule in the Soviet Union reacted to various shafing dish unpleasant things: pretending that nothing has happened. The day after the accident nearby, built in the city Pripjat people walking in summer clothes and wondered why the streets are so much dust. First May almost a nearby Kiev hosted the parade. People marched through the streets and celebrated realizing how radiation they receive. Only then, when people began to worry abroad, from whence so much to them to radiation, the Soviet Union recognized that an accident has occurred.
Of course, this event in the eyes of the Soviet Union, the ruling Dura irresponsible, careless attitude towards people shafing dish and life safety and low quality standards, which also led to the accident. However, the majority of people out there saw something else: a clear proof that nuclear power is unacceptably dangerous form of energy that should shafing dish be banned as soon as possible.
This reaction shafing dish is quite unusual. For example, when the Titanic sank, people concluded that vessels need to provide lifeboats for all people, not for a ban on passenger ships. When people died in car accidents, manufacturers decided to introduce seat belts, not ban cars. However, after the Chernobyl accident, shafing dish the people came to the conclusion not that nuclear power plants are variations in safety standards are not acceptable, but the fact that nuclear energy should be banned.
Atomic opponents quickly realized that fear works much better for logical explanations, so wrote a new fear stories shafing dish of what they called the arguments against the use of nuclear energy. These are about as follows:
1) Any AES can happen at any time of the second Chernobyl. Might as well also say that any aircraft at any time, it may fall and everyone who travels by plane, shafing dish a significant shafing dish risk their lives. However, such arguments shafing dish do not take into account the facts: flying is the safest way to travel, shafing dish and any other nuclear power plant, shafing dish either before or after the Chernobyl accident has taken place, no, that would be something about it comparable. The number of victims in terms of the next largest crash happened in Japan, died when two AES employees.
2) AES is a potential terrorist target. Terrorism seems to be today's shafing dish favorite bogey. By being able to justify everything from invasions of Iraq and ending with the closing of AES. Of course, the obvious solution is to strengthen nuclear security, but it certainly is not as easy as it shut down.
3) AES pollute the environment.
